The Chicago Cubs’ pursuit of Alex Bregman appears increasingly unlikely given the financial and strategic hurdles involved. While Bregman would undoubtedly bolster the Cubs’ infield and lineup, his preference for a long-term deal conflicts with Chicago’s plans, and even a short-term agreement would strain their payroll flexibility.
The Cubs are mindful of remaining near the luxury tax threshold, and signing Bregman would trigger additional penalties, including the loss of second and fifth-round draft picks, international bonus pool money, and other spending capabilities. These consequences are compounded by Bregman rejecting his Qualifying Offer, making his acquisition an even more costly endeavor for a team already navigating tight financial constraints.
Instead, the Cubs seem poised to prioritize fortifying their bullpen and adding a reliable closer, while also seeking affordable bench upgrades. This approach aligns with their goal of balancing competitiveness with long-term sustainability, especially given their intent to stay below—or at least not far above—the luxury tax. While Bregman would have been a high-profile addition, the Cubs’ current focus appears more pragmatic as they address multiple needs without compromising future flexibility.